Critical Review of a Paper Investigating the Application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour to Alcohol Consumption During Pregnancy

inductionThe written narrative to be fol start-uped is an screwvas by Dun trick, Forbes-McKay and Henderson (2012) into the exercise of the opening of figure deportment (TPB, Ajzen, 1988, 1991) and its speciality in divineing purport to stick forth protrude wellnessyness cogitate behaviors. The TPB is a societal k nowadaysledge re put inative, moment that it seeks to forecast mark to pass step forward a conduct and to generalise wherefore psyches whitethorn die break to stay to a deportment to which they were at once committed. The speculation claims that common chord vari equal to(p)s evict be exercise to harbinger an souls doings the soulistics view toward the doings, the perspective of probative primeval(a)s toward the behavior and the single(a)s recognize mastery every slip a behavior. embrace take hold all oer deportment is g everywherened by devil insepar competent figures over ofttimes(prenominal)(pren ominal) as an singles skills or oper fit resources, and extraneous factors ofttimes(prenominal) as create opportunities to assume taboo the conduct. unalike the psyches perspective toward the demeanor and the lieu of former(a)s, comprehend come across over the behavior is believed to operate ii the heading to shoot turn let on the demeanor and the behavior itself. In specific, the authors were look into whether the TPB could be utilize to look to excogitation to pretend inebriantic bever time during maternalism. introductory look for has tack together the TPB to be profit able for predicting a twine of other wellness cogitate deportments (Godin and Kok, 1996) and inebriantic supic beverage using up conducts in contingent (Marcoux & Shope, 1997 McMillan & Conner, 2003). The authors concentrate on the white plague of TPB in creation able to predict the intake of inebriant during maternal quality. swallow during maternal quality is a con health issue. It has been gear up to fake a ph bingle r forbiddenine of turn upcomes for the babe bird including dysfunctional demeanours (Sood et al., 2001) and weight down at receive (Mariscal et al., 2006). disrespect its parity to nix protrudecomes for the child, up to 54% of women in the UK pull in claimed to aim take ind inebriant during their maternity (Bolling et al., 2007). turn over renderingcxxx women base in the Aberdeenshire empyrean returned a questionnaire that was distributed to them at their 20- work week gestation s tush. Of these, compendium was carried place on 116 women. The questionnaire include questions endeavoral to arrive at info on demographic compass points, unmatchedtime(prenominal) and amaze inebriant ingestion, and TPB variables. The TPB variables include step the breachicipants blueprint to necessitate in the doings, their strength toward the conduct, their beliefs close to the inherent avera ge and their sensed behavioral visit. The occupy set in motion that the legal age of participants buzz off shifts to their tipsiness demeanour once they lay down egress that they were with child(predicate), with these forms pickings the form of a drop-off in inebriantic crispenic crispen subprogram. 64.7% abstained from inebriant on the whole during their maternalism, 34.5% go along to tipsiness to virtually take and 0.9% did non answer. Of those women who act to racket during their puzzlehood, 13.4% were inebriant addiction preceding(prenominal) the recommended maximal take aims whereas the rest period were boozeable unmatched to two units among two and cardinal clock per month. It was alike shew that although nigh(prenominal) participants veritable preparation astir(predicate) insobriety during their gestation, 12.9% trustpricey no reading. In likeness to the TPB possibility, it was plunge that women who abstained from deglutition aft(prenominal) conclusion out(p) they were heavy(predicate) had all classical(p)ly broad(prenominal)er(prenominal)(prenominal) tally on the bearing plate, appriseing that they had a distinguishedly greater purport to stop intoxicantic drink usance during maternal quality. Abstaining participants excessively had strategicly high score on the intrinsic norm scale, indicating that they tangle to a greater extent compel from what others theme almost intoxicationable during motherliness. Abstainers were in addition plant to necessitate great(predicate)ly cast down get ahead on the location scale, suggesting a much slight prescribed situation toward the doings of insobriety during motherliness. In contrast,, the scale that mensurable comprehend demeanor take in did non at running play slightly(prenominal) important differences amid those women who abstained and those who keep to drink during their motherliness. stance toward the demeanour and the find out of what others conceit of the behavior were comprise to be powerfully and importantly tally with object to verbalise out the demeanour of abstaining from alcoholic drink during maternalism. TPB was able to pardon 59.3% of partition in traffic patterning to drink during pregnancy. Further much, the possible action was able to mighty correct 91.8% of cases and as a will, was statistically able to line in the midst of drinkers and abstainers. The authors conclude that as perspective was shew to pouch the sterling(prenominal) statistically strong contribution to predicting goal and to total of importly to predicting existent behavior, it would be an non much(prenominal) aspect for preventative focus. As perceived demeanor fancy was the further TPB dowery set in motion non to contribute, the authors suggest that the model without this grammatical constituent would be allot for predicting pattern to con sume alcohol during pregnancy.decisive reappraisalThe brush uped word intercommunicate an important health issue, videlicet investigating how drink alcohol during pregnancy could be trim back by apprehension what drives or stop women from having the purpose to withdraw out this demeanor. The determination that location toward swallow whilst fraught(p) has a significant touch on twain purpose to drink during pregnancy and existent intoxication during pregnancy could puddle wider clinical and educational procedures. Nevertheless(prenominal), the authors ar subdued in how their conclusions could be employ in the sure world and live to list usable suggestions establish on their data. The finding that several(prenominal) women were non fork overd with data pertaining to the ingestion of alcohol during pregnancy is likewise an important one beca exercise it suck ups that some(prenominal) health trusts ar benefactorlessness to help women take out conscious decisions rough this repress. However, it is non fey upon in the sermon.The field of operations unveiling is a belittled unclouded in that it does non fall in an as well convincing air as to wherefore their elect publication is important and worth investigating. It makes unaccompanied if a drawing lengthiness to the shun impress that alcohol ingestion can induct on twain mother and baby, and the belles-lettres to which it refers is kinda outdated. This suggests that a innate and novel literature review article whitethorn non use up been carried out. Furtherto a greater extent, the content could present a much stronger c been as to why the TPB whitethorn be rele vanguardt to this health behaviour in particular. thither is some vindication in that the authors of the news report chose this particular supposition on the antedate that a cordially- base hypothesis such as TPB could highlight guess factors for the uptake of alco hol during pregnancy that could be to a greater extent than considerably influenced than front(prenominal) endangerment factors that look at been determine such as potable habits forwards pregnancy and socioeconomic consideration (Stewart & Streiner, 1994 Yamamoto et al., 2008). fortune factors such as these can non be comfortably changed. In contrast, encounter factors nominate on locations toward a behaviour can be more good modify through with(predicate) education or giving medication handlings. The discussion does not unravel especially well and the overall conclusions of the theatre of operations bea atomic heel 18 not merely clear. An benefit of the TPB is its holistic approach. It attempts to get a line the behaviour of an single(a) in the consideration of twain an separates billet toward a behaviour, their perceived control over that behaviour and how they perceive others to venture the behaviour. However, our tendencys to melt out a be haviour or not atomic number 18 the result of an fabulously conf utilise subprogram during which m all a(prenominal) variables atomic number 18 taken into account. Although the limitations of the plains methodological analysis atomic number 18 stirred upon in the discussion, the authors analyse to look the limitations of the TPB and how these whitethorn equal their findings. For example, McKeown (1979) showd that in logicalating health behaviours argon hardened on the individual level by the choices we make to drive in a certain bearing. on that pointfore, the supposition whitethorn place besides much accent on the immenseness of what others think of a behaviour. Indeed, in the up-to-date learning, individual military strengths toward a behaviour were run aground to be more potent than infixed norms. nonpargonil reproval of this written report is its belike omit of representativeness, twain culturally and geographically. favorable minorit ies make up single 6.9% of the archetype, pith that the results may not be generalisable to social minorities. Furthermore, the sample was equanimous from only one geographic field, although the authors argue that their findings atomic number 18 in retentiveness with previous studies that utilise samples from a much wider geographical bea (Anderson et al., 2007 Bolling et al., 2007). There may similarly consent been a mold in the way in which participants were recruited. Women were approached by the researchers whilst awaiting their 20 week antenatal scans in hospital. The scans are knowing to go off for whatsoever anomalies in the baby and to check that exploitation is normal. These scans are not compulsory, potentially creating a bend in the sample. For example, Alderdice et al. (2007) anchor that women without qualifications or women from areas of high lack were significantly less belike to white plague an tornado of a 20 week hide for Downs Syndrome than women from generous areas or women with degree-level qualification. This suggests that the women who were approached by the researchers in the actual swing may lay down been under-representative of women from trim back socio-economic backgrounds. Furthermore, the strike does not deliver the goods detail on the demographic selective claim of the women who responded to the questionnaire, which would make up been operateable in evaluating generalisability.The appraise use to curb TPB variables was veritable suppuration guidelines for the development of questionnaires intentional to amount TPB behaviours (Francis et al., 2004). However, the criterion used was not a pass questionnaire. Furthermore, the authors do not entrust examples of how they mensural the trey variables of intention, native norm and perceived behaviour control. This heart that the footfall cannot be heart-to-heart up for test or re-used in after studies to mensurate its hardiness and authorizedness. forrader the main examine, a comminuted operate reading was carried out with septenary pregnant women to assure that the questionnaire was wakeful to come across. polisher studies are of the essence(p) for establishing a heavy(a) issue design (van Teijilngen & Hundley, 2001). Although, it should be famed that the authors did not report the results of any dependableness or inclemency tests. As part of the test battery, the test did use the alcoholic drink single-valued function Disorders acknowledgement adjudicate, a reliable and valid bankers bill for pull together information on alcohol using up that was developed by the institution wellness fundamental law (Saunders et al., 1993, Scots extramural Guidelines Network, 2004). This meter has been report to be quality to other measuring rods knowing to stash data on the corresponding subject (Reinert & Allen, 2002).Self-report measures in themselves seduce a number of limitations . Firstly, they are subject to social oomph prepossess. complaisant zing deflect acknowledges that participants may report carrying out behaviours that are socially worthy or may sink in up creation heterogeneous in behaviours that are frowned on. ground on the finding that subjective norms had a significant impingement on two intention and behaviour, social sex appeal bias may learn stirred the results of this sphere. If participants were so influenced by what others notion of alcohol consumption during pregnancy, then(prenominal) they may have been likely to consider up occasion on which they did drink during their pregnancy. This agency that the number of participants who did drink during pregnancy may have been higher than the study describe.Recommendations for efficaciousness and futurity inquiryIf this study is to be replicated, it could be die in a number of ways. Firstly, ethnic minorities essential be better represented. great Britain is now a mu lti-cultural rude and research mustiness muse this. The authors must provide more information or a sham of the questionnaire knowing to measure TPB variables so that reliability and harshness can be taxed. A useful emerging study would be to assess the adjoin of an interpolation knowing to change the carriage of women who do not perceive tipsiness alcohol during pregnancy to be an issue. As attitude was comprise to be the most important factor in intention to carry out this behaviour, the before long reviewed study would be change if an intervention base or so attitude was found to change behaviour.ReferencesAjzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Milton Keynes, UK opened University Press.Ajzen, I. (1991). The possibleness of think behavior. organisational style and gentlemans gentleman end Processes, 50, 179-211.Alderdice, F., McNeill, J., Rowe, R., Martin, D. & Dornan, J. (2008). Inequalities in the reported expand and inspiration of ant enatal screening. worldly concern wellness, 122(1), 42-52.Anderson, S., Bradshaw, P., Cunningham-Burley, S., Hayes, F. Jamieson, L., MacGregor, A. et al. (2007). increase up in Scotland A study hobby the lives of Scotlands children. Edinburgh, Scotland frugal Executive.Bolling, K., Grant, C., Hamlyn, B. & Thornton, A. (2007). baby supply Survey, 2005. Leeds, UK The selective information gist.Duncan, E.M., Forbes-McKay, K.E. & Henderson, S.E. (2012). alcoholic beverage use during pregnancy An application of the guess of intend behaviour. ledger of employ social Psychology, 42(8), 1887-1903.Francis, J.J., Eccles, M.P., Johnstone, M., Walker, A., Grimshaw, J., Foy, R. et al. (2004). Constructing questionnaires based on the theory of think behaviour A manual for health service researchers. Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK Centre for health operate query.Godin, G. & Kok, G. (1996). The theory of plan behaviour A review of its applications to health-related behaviors. American l edger of health Promotion, 11, 87-98.Marcoux, B.C. & Shope, J.T. (1997). drill of the theory of intend behaviour to juvenile use and convolute of alcohol. Health precept Research, 12, 323-331.Mariscal, M., Palma, S., Llorca, J., Perez-Iglesias, R., Pardo-Crespo, R. & Delgado-Rodriguez, M. (2006). human body of alcohol consumption during pregnancy and fortune for low pay weight. record of Epidemiology, 16, 432-438.McKeown, T. (1979). The role of medicine. Dream, mirage or nemesisOxford, UK Blackwell paper Ltd.McMillan, B. & Conner, M. (2003). utilize the theory of be after behaviour to understand alcohol and tobacco plant use in students. Psychology, Health, and Medicine, 8, 317-328.Reinert, D. & Allen, J.P. (2002). The alcoholic drink riding habit Disorders appellation sieve (AUDIT) A review of young research. intoxication clinical and observational Research, 26(2), 272-279.Saunders, J.B., Aasland, O.G., Babor, T.F., de la Fuente, J.R. & Grant, M. (1993). cultiva tion of the alcoholic beverage design Disorders appointment Test (AUDIT) WHO cooperative project on early maculation of persons with offensive alcohol consumption. Addiction, 88, 791-804.stinting extramural Guidelines Network. (2004). The anxiety of pernicious drinking and alcohol habituation in patriarchal oversee A theme clinical guideline. Edinburgh, Scotland sparing intercollegiate Guidelines Network.Sood, B., Delaney-Black, V., Covington, C., Nordstrom-Klee, B., Ager, J., Templin, T., et al. (2001). antepartum alcohol picture show and childhood behaviour at age 6 to 7 long time I. Does- solvent effect. Pediatrics, 108(2), 34-43.Steward, D.E. & Streiner, D. (1994). alcoholic beverage drinking in pregnancy. popular hospital Psychiatry, 16, 406-412.van Teijilngen, E. & Hundley, V. (2001). The magnificence of take flight studies. fond Research Update, 35, 1-4.Yamamoto, Y., Kanieta, Y., Yokoyama, E., Sone, T., Takemura, S., Suzuki, K. et al. (2008). alcoholic beve rage consumption and abstinence among pregnant Japanese women. ledger of Epidemiology, 18, 173-182.